Tina, I really like the way this piece came out. I agree with the comments that were made today about the texture of the background, but I disagree about changing the proportions of the figures. The "Giant"'s legs seem appropriately awkward to me. As far as the text goes, I think the piece might be stronger if you used stronger (even offensive?) language. For example, instead of "dwarf" you could say "midget." I'll leave the rest to your imagination. Doing this would make this an edgier piece, but its point would be precisely to make people feel uncomfortable (and thus to think). Other than those two things I don't have any suggestions -- I love the concept and the overall execution.
Tina, I really like the way this piece came out. I agree with the comments that were made today about the texture of the background, but I disagree about changing the proportions of the figures. The "Giant"'s legs seem appropriately awkward to me. As far as the text goes, I think the piece might be stronger if you used stronger (even offensive?) language. For example, instead of "dwarf" you could say "midget." I'll leave the rest to your imagination. Doing this would make this an edgier piece, but its point would be precisely to make people feel uncomfortable (and thus to think). Other than those two things I don't have any suggestions -- I love the concept and the overall execution.
ReplyDelete